Sign in Subscribe

DOGE and Data Privacy: What We Actually Know

DOGE and Data Privacy: What We Actually Know

The real story behind the Department of Government Efficiency's controversial data access

When Elon Musk's Department of Government Efficiency (DOGE) launched in January 2025, it promised to eliminate government waste and fraud. But as the months have unfolded, a different story has emerged—one centered on unprecedented access to Americans' most sensitive personal data.

The Scope of Data Access

According to court documents and reporting from The Washington Post and NPR, DOGE has gained access to databases across at least seven major federal agencies, including:

  • Social Security Administration: Records containing hundreds of millions of Americans' financial and personal information
  • Treasury Department: Payment systems handling tax refunds, Social Security benefits, and veterans' benefits
  • Office of Personnel Management: Data on current and former federal employees
  • Consumer Financial Protection Bureau: Proprietary information about financial algorithms and consumer data
  • Department of Education: Student loan and education records
  • Internal Revenue Service: Tax and financial information

The scope is significant. As The Washington Post reported, DOGE has been "racing to build a single centralized database with vast troves of personal information about millions of U.S. citizens."

The data access has triggered at least 14 lawsuits across federal courts, all alleging violations of the Privacy Act of 1974—a Watergate-era law designed to protect Americans' personal information held by the government.

Key court findings include:

  • A federal judge in Maryland blocked DOGE from accessing Social Security data, stating the government "never identified or articulated even a single reason" why DOGE needed "unlimited access" to protected information
  • Multiple judges found that agencies "rushed" to give DOGE access without proper safeguards
  • A Treasury Department employee was "mistakenly" given write access to payment systems handling trillions of dollars
  • Courts have ordered the deletion of improperly obtained data in some cases

The Security Concerns

Cybersecurity experts have raised alarms about DOGE's approach to data consolidation. Charles Henderson of Coalfire security company told The Washington Post: "Separation and segmentation is one of the core principles in sound cybersecurity. Putting all your eggs in one basket means I don't need to go hunting for them—I can just steal the basket."

Specific concerns include:

  • Removal of protections around sensitive information
  • Websites set up without proper security protocols
  • Access granted to individuals without proper training in handling classified information
  • Potential for data breaches that could affect millions of Americans

The Immigration Database Connection

Separately, DOGE has been working with data analytics company Palantir to build what CNN described as a "master database to speed-up immigration enforcement and deportations." This involves combining sensitive data from across the federal government to create targeting lists for Immigration and Customs Enforcement.

Palantir, co-founded by Peter Thiel (a Trump ally and Musk associate), already had government contracts but this expanded role in immigration enforcement has drawn criticism from former employees and privacy advocates.

Where Things Stand Now

Musk's Departure: Elon Musk officially left DOGE in May 2025 after a public falling out with President Trump, though the initiative continues under new leadership.

Ongoing Legal Battles: The Supreme Court ruled in June 2025 to allow DOGE access to Social Security Administration data, despite objections from three liberal justices.

Institutional Changes: Some DOGE staff have taken permanent positions within federal agencies, potentially embedding these data access practices into government operations.

The Broader Questions

The DOGE data controversy raises fundamental questions about:

Privacy Protection: Whether 50-year-old privacy laws are adequate to protect Americans in the digital age

Government Oversight: The appropriate level of access political appointees should have to citizen data

Data Security: The risks of centralizing vast amounts of personal information

Accountability: Who has oversight when traditional safeguards are bypassed

What We Don't Know

Despite extensive reporting, key questions remain unanswered:

  • The full extent of data that has been collected or copied
  • How long the data will be retained
  • What specific purposes the centralized database will serve beyond stated efficiency goals
  • Whether any data has been shared with private entities

Moving Forward

Privacy advocates, federal employee unions, and Democratic lawmakers continue to challenge DOGE's data practices in court. Meanwhile, the Trump administration maintains that all activities are legal and necessary for government efficiency.

The outcome of these legal battles will likely set important precedents for how government data can be accessed and used in the digital age—affecting not just current operations but the privacy rights of all Americans going forward.

Bottom Line: While the stated goal of reducing government waste is broadly popular, the methods being used to access citizen data have raised legitimate concerns about privacy, security, and constitutional protections that deserve public attention and oversight.

This post is based on verified reporting from major news outlets and court documents. The situation continues to evolve as legal challenges proceed through the courts.